"cap and trade" typed on a sheet of paper still in a typewriter

Cap and Trade in a Nutshell

You may have heard a lot late­ly about the cap and trade bill which was recent­ly sped through the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives and is cur­rent­ly in the Sen­ate. And you may have, like I had, absolute­ly no idea what “cap and trade” — emis­sions trad­ing — is all about.

I asked Dad for a bit of clar­i­fi­ca­tion, and here it is, as I under­stand it. [2019 note: Please do not make the mis­take of think­ing Dad agreed with my cli­mate change denial in this post. He explained cap and trade well; I was just too tied up in a con­ser­v­a­tive mind­set to know any better.]

Cap and trade leg­is­la­tion is intrin­si­cal­ly tied to the idea that not only is mankind some­how affect­ing the cli­mate of Earth but that such effects are sig­nif­i­cant and could result in Very Bad Things. 

The leg­is­la­tion would put into place mea­sures which would curb the pre­sumed caus­es of cli­mate change by lim­it­ing how much car­bon busi­ness­es would be allowed to release into the envi­ron­ment. This is the “cap” part. They would be able to pur­chase increased allowances and pre­sum­ably be able to sell unused por­tions of their allot­ment to oth­er busi­ness­es — the “trade” part.”

The leg­is­la­tion will increase the cost of ener­gy. Elec­tric­i­ty, nat­ur­al gas, and even gaso­line will be affected.

Var­i­ous num­bers have been tossed around as to how much more per year each house­hold will have to pay for ener­gy costs. Var­i­ous con­ser­v­a­tive sources I’ve seen have cit­ed any­where from $1,700 to $3,000 per year per house­hold. One source I’ve seen stat­ed that the aver­age house­hold in (I think) Ohio would be pay­ing $300 per month more just for electricity.

Lib­er­al sources are quot­ing much low­er costs, though, with increas­es of $150 to $200 per year per house­hold. That’s obvi­ous­ly a much more palat­able number!

But why is there a discrepancy?

The num­bers quot­ed by the con­ser­v­a­tives seem to be based on ener­gy use remain­ing con­stant; in oth­er words and for exam­ple, a house­hold will be $1,500 more per year if the fam­i­ly makes no changes in their habits and way of life.

The low­er num­bers quot­ed by lib­er­als take into account changes in lifestyle which they hope fam­i­lies will embrace.

So what does cap and trade leg­is­la­tion boil down to?

It is the nation­al encour­age­ment of a changed qual­i­ty of life by those who buy into bunk sci­ence upon every­one, whether they accept the sci­ence or not.

You may not think your gas-pow­ered car is hav­ing a neg­a­tive effect on the envi­ron­ment, but to jus­ti­fy new­er eco-friend­ly cars, the gov­ern­ment wants to jack up the price of gaso­line as an “encour­age­ment” to dri­ve what they want you to drive.

Yes, you’re right, cap and trade is an intru­sive, manip­u­la­tive mess.

Good thing I make less than $250,000 per year so that none of this extra bur­den will apply to me… Oh, wait…

7 thoughts on “Cap and Trade in a Nutshell”

  1. Besides the month­ly ener­gy costs, the costs for just about every­thing relat­ed to own­ing a home (land­lords own and would have to pass the costs on to ten­ants) are incred­i­ble. I’m in real estate and this bill will will def­i­nite­ly affect my clients. Check out this out from JamieWear­ing­Fool

    Beyond what it will do to our econ­o­my, at the end of the debate House GOP Leader John Boehn­er took to the floor and start­ed read­ing from the 300 page amend­ment that the Democ­rats draft­ed and dropped on the leg­is­la­tures at 3 AM, there was lit­er­al­ly hun­dred of items to impose fed­er­al con­trol over your life. Here are some highlights.

    Want to replace a win­dow? Not so fast. First you must pay for an appraisal of your house to mea­sure its ener­gy effi­cien­cy and receive cal­cu­la­tions of both before and after the pro­posed change. Hey, it may be a great excuse for those guys try­ing to avoid putting in that big bay style win­dow that the mis­sus has been bug­ging you about.

    Are you hav­ing a new house built? Back up, Skip­py. This bill includes lan­guage that tells you exact­ly where you can put your elec­tri­cal outlets.

    Did you know that for one sort of appraisal ser­vice relat­ed to deter­min­ing ener­gy effi­cien­cy there is only one com­pa­ny you can use? Yup, it is right in there along with the name of the com­pa­ny. How is it that this one com­pa­ny man­aged to land the only con­tract to ser­vice 300 mil­lion Amer­i­cans? Who is this company?

    I wish I could answer those ques­tions, but all of those pro­vi­sions and more, Rep. Boehn­er went on for almost an hour cit­ing them and still didn’t get through the whole 300 pages, is not avail­able. You see because of when the Democ­rats dropped this amend­ment at 3 AM the text of it is not avail­able. So much for that trans­paren­cy. The total bill runs on for more then 1500 pages and it con­trols every aspect of your life, from what type of car we will be able to pro­duce and buy to what type of appli­ances you have in your house.

    Under some of these pro­vi­sions you won’t be able to sell your house. Got your eyes and a quaint lit­tle place out the way and off the beat­en path? For­get about it. By the time you went through the time and expense to get it up to the new code pro­posed in this leg­is­la­tion that lit­tle place in the woods will resem­ble some­thing out the Jetsons.

    So for those who were at work and get­ting ready for their week­end, and were sim­ply tired of the wall-to-wall cov­er­age of Michael Jack­son, you came just one more step clos­er to being less free today then you were yes­ter­day. And by the way, Con­gress has blown town for a two-week vaca­tion. It is hard work turn­ing a Repub­lic into a Social­ist state. This must be stopped in the Senate.

    My biggest fear now, how­ev­er, is if the Repub­li­cans couldn’t stop this, a bill that will throw hun­dreds of thou­sands if not mil­lions out of work as the com­pa­nies they work for go bel­ly up or leave the coun­try and imposed what amounts to a nation­al home­own­ers asso­ci­a­tion on all of us, what chance do they have of stop­ping the nation­al­ized health care?

  2. My Repub­li­can Con­gress­man says Cap and Trade will be good for America.
    And, he caught the Green Riv­er Killer.
    Did you catch the Green Riv­er Killer?
    No, no you didn’t.
    You can hear his inter­view here.

    http://www.mynorthwest.com/?nid=194&sid=184941

    Dave Reichert SPEAKS: says Cap and Trade will be good for America
    He argued that the expense would not be what the Heart­land Insti­tute, Her­itage Foun­da­tion, and Wall Street Jour­nal were pre­dict­ing. He argued that it would cost around $.48 per day and that we would have bet­ter nation­al secu­ri­ty, more nuclear, coal and refin­ing capa­bil­i­ties, and a clean­er envi­ron­ment with the bill. He argued that the con­ser­v­a­tive argu­ments against were mis­tak­en, and that Wash­ing­ton specif­i­cal­ly would be bet­ter off even though the bill was imperfect.

    And, he caught the Green Riv­er Killer.

    Yeah, it took him a cou­ple of decades, but bet­ter late than never.
    I hear Fox was think­ing about mak­ing the Series 24 about Reichert. But instead of show­ing 24 hours in a day they would have to make each episode a year.

  3. I have not read the bill, so I can­not speak to the specifics that Ben­jamin lists. I would note that nei­ther he nor the web site he links to make any effort to doc­u­ment the claims.

    I did see that Jam­mie Wear­ing Fool links to Michelle Malkin who tries to claim that there is a “place­hold­er” in the bill. I encour­age every­one to take a look:

    http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/01/here-is-the-cap-and-tax-placeholder-wheres-the-fine-print/

    Now, if it isn’t too much trou­ble, you might want to go to the actu­al bill on line

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.2454.EH:

    and scroll down to the appro­pri­ate part of the table of con­tents, you will see that no such entry exists. (It is past halfway down. If you do a find for “sub­ti­tle B” it will be the third occur­ance, I believe).

    So, lots of unsub­stan­ti­at­ed claims and an out­right, lets be gen­er­ous, mistake.

    Very con­vinc­ing.

    Make no mis­take, if the bill requires I upgrade the win­dows before sell­ing the house or that I pay a con­sul­tant for a study before I replace a win­dow, etc., I will agree the bill should not pass. But I need evi­dence, not just claims.

  4. I now see that the “place­hold­er” that Michelle Malkin ref­er­enced was in the bill “report­ed in the House”, but it is not in the bill passed by the house. So Michelle is cit­ing the wrong ver­sion. Since the bill passed on June 26 and Michelle post­ed July 1 I think that’s a pret­ty big mis­take, if it is one.

  5. In this, the new era of respon­si­bil­i­ty, weren’t we sup­posed to be able to find these bills on one of the admin­is­tra­tion’s many sites for review? As far as I know, this bill was amend­ed at 3AM the day of the vote, and those changes were not merged into the final bill before it was passed…? Did­n’t the same thing hap­pened with the so-called stim­u­lus bill?

    1. I think you’re con­fused, Claude… Nobody real­ly expects any­one to keep cam­paign promis­es. They’re like movie trail­ers — they can make any movie look funny/action packed/emotional/awesome, no mat­ter how lame/dull/boring/fail it is. Noth­in’ but adver­tis­ing, all of it, and we all know how hon­est ads are.

      But by God, we’re Amer­i­cans, and we have the right to be swin­dled by any man­u­fac­tur­er, pro­duc­er, or politi­cian that we want.

      Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go dry the Great Lakes with my ShamWow.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Use your Gravatar-enabled email address while commenting to automatically enhance your comment with some of Gravatar's open profile data.

Comments must be made in accordance with the comment policy. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam; learn how your comment data is processed.

You may use Markdown to format your comments; additionally, these HTML tags and attributes may be used: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Rick Beckman