child building with interlocking building blocks


Some­times I won­der why I use the book­marks fea­ture of any web brows­er. Aside from keep­ing a list of quick-access web­sites in my book­marks bar, any oth­er book­marks end up in a fold­er with hun­dreds of oth­er sites which I’ll like­ly nev­er actu­al­ly get back to.

I thought I’d do a bit of curat­ing of my book­marks, and I came across this brief bit of advice called “Just.”

The author, Brad Frost, lament­ed the respons­es he’d receive on Twit­ter when ask­ing for tech help because, as he describes, they often tend­ed to assume things about his knowl­edge by pre­sent­ing answers in an over-sim­pli­fied man­ner intro­duced by the word “Just…”

Rather than being help­ful, those answers made him feel like an idiot, as if he was lack­ing what oth­ers seemed to con­sid­er to be fun­da­men­tal under­stand­ing of a topic.

Back when I book­marked the thing, I’m sure I did so with the hope that apply­ing the advice to ban “just…” over­sim­pli­fi­ca­tions, I’d be a bet­ter writer when it came to top­ics of blog­ging, code, and even religion.

How­ev­er, the “just…” short­cut is far more uni­ver­sal, show­ing up in every man­ner of conversation. 

When I was still new to my job in retail, I remem­ber watch­ing my cowork­ers — who often had sev­er­al years of expe­ri­ence — inter­act­ing with the cus­tomers thus: “It’s just on that end­cap,” “It’s just that the item is not-trait­ed for our store,” and so on.

Inevitably, there would have to be more expla­na­tion giv­en to explain the ter­mi­nol­o­gy being used, and it was­n’t hard to miss the frus­tra­tion in the faces of cus­tomers when work­ers would explain things to them in a way which pre­sup­posed that the cus­tomer under­stood the fun­da­men­tals of retail. I did my absolute best from an ear­ly peri­od to speak to cus­tomers in a way which ignored the lan­guage of retail and instead pre­sent­ed answers to them in a way which was acces­si­ble to them, regard­less of what their back­ground might be.

I’ve now been a super­vi­sor at my job for (holy cats…) near­ly four­teen years, and I have helped train (either ini­tial­ly or as fur­ther train­ing) many peo­ple. The “just…” short­cut makes its way into train­ing all too often, often lead­ing to unsat­is­fac­to­ry work per­for­mance or frus­trat­ed employ­ees who lack the con­fi­dence to do as good of a job as they’d like to do.

With­out exag­ger­a­tion, when I became a super­vi­sor, my “train­ing” for the job con­sist­ed of one sen­tence: “Here’s your depart­ment, and if you have any ques­tions, just ask Michelle, your neigh­bor [in the next depart­ment over].” I strug­gled those first two years, rarely man­ag­ing to actu­al­ly please the man­age­ment over my area. I can’t help but won­der if ade­quate train­ing cou­pled with clear expec­ta­tions would’ve made any difference!

Hav­ing come across “Just” again tonight in my book­marks, I’m sad­dened by just how much it sticks out that I’ve fall­en into the “just…” habit with the folk I super­vise. Hav­ing explained how to fix a miss­ing time clock punch or how to prop­er­ly build an end cap or how to deal with a spill or what­ev­er else has become so blasé, and I nev­er even noticed.

I’m not one for mak­ing res­o­lu­tions for new years, and I’m cer­tain­ly not one to keep res­o­lu­tions when I do make them, but this is an impor­tant mat­ter, not (heh) just for my job itself but for those around me who do look to me for accu­rate and thor­ough expla­na­tions. I don’t want to be guilty of the same “train­ing” which was once giv­en to me so long ago!

I hope to, in 2018, become a bet­ter train­er and a bet­ter explain­er by ban­ish­ing the “just…” atti­tude. It is a lazy short­cut which does noth­ing to enable under­stand­ing in my listeners.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Use your Gravatar-enabled email address while commenting to automatically enhance your comment with some of Gravatar's open profile data.

Comments must be made in accordance with the comment policy. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam; learn how your comment data is processed.

You may use Markdown to format your comments; additionally, these HTML tags and attributes may be used: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Rick Beckman