The Efficacy of the Lord’s Supper

There was a point in time that being pur­pose­ful­ly exclud­ed from the “Lord’s Sup­per” was a mean­ing­ful pun­ish­ment for believ­ers who sin.

I’ve nev­er heard of any­one los­ing the oppor­tu­ni­ty to par­take of the meal for any rea­son in any of the church­es I’ve been involved with. I won­der, though, is that pun­ish­ment at all effec­tive anymore? 

If not, I con­jec­ture that it is due to what I see as a fun­da­men­tal dif­fer­ence between New Tes­ta­ment Lord’s Sup­pers and those of the con­tem­po­rary church:

What was once an inti­mate remem­brance meal among believ­ers has become over­whelm­ing­ly rit­u­al­ized. Like­wise, the ele­ments which are meant to rep­re­sent the flesh and blood of the Son of God have been reduced to a tiny wafer and half an ounce of grace juice.

The more I think about this, the more it both­ers me. Am I right to be annoyed by some­thing like this?

6 thoughts on “The Efficacy of the Lord’s Supper”

  1. Rick,

    I think the prob­lem you’ve iden­ti­fied lies more with the treat­ment of the Lord’s Sup­per by the par­tic­u­lar church (and with our own view of it), and less with the ele­ments. It’s only in recent years that I’ve seen this pre­sent­ed clear­ly as an activ­i­ty for believ­ers — and believ­ers only:

    - Par­tic­i­pa­tion is manda­to­ry for Christians
    — Self exam­i­na­tion is required, with the con­fes­sion of sin, before participation
    — Sin (or a “bad week”) is nev­er an excuse to skip par­tic­i­pa­tion, as that entire­ly avoids the point of sub­sti­tu­tion­ary atonement
    — Unbe­liev­ers are nev­er to par­take, as this is a dec­la­ra­tion of one­ness with Christ, and par­tic­i­pa­tion as an unbe­liev­er is mak­ing a false claim for Christ

    Hav­ing the impor­tance and sym­bol­ism out­lined before each tak­ing of the Lord’s Table has helped turn what used to be a bor­ing event for me into a mean­ing­ful event — I can now joy­ful­ly act in obe­di­ence to Christ.

    Ryan

  2. Ryan: I whole­heart­ed­ly agree with your points, and I’m not deny­ing that many church­es, at least most of the hand­ful I’ve been involved with, do bring those points to light.

    None of those things, in my mind, excuse the use of com­mer­cial­ized bags of wafers and the like. He seemed none too pleased when His tem­ple was com­mer­cial­ized; how much more should we guard that which rep­re­sents not only His pres­ence but His body?

  3. True … we use Won­der­bread, I think. Cost­co grape juice in dis­pos­able plas­tic cups (sor­ry Gree­nies). AND a clear dec­la­ra­tion that there is noth­ing spe­cial about the bread and juice — that they don’t become some­thing else, but remain bread and juice act­ing as sym­bols to remind us of Christ’s death and the new covenant.

  4. My church sounds very sim­im­lar to RFK’s. It’s not irrev­er­ent, but real­ly in mem­o­ry of Christ’s sac­ri­fice and in reflec­tion of our depen­dence on him, noth­ing more fan­cy than that. I think it’s good to have full meals togeth­er some­times as well. We’ve had din­ner with a short talk instead of church a cou­ple of times and often hang out for din­ner after church. I think wafers or super­mar­ket bread are about prac­ti­cal­i­ty… It’s a bit eas­i­er to have an inti­mate meal with 12 or 13 than with 50 or more.

  5. I had meant to include this in the pre­vi­ous com­ment, but was out of time last night when writing.

    We have a month­ly “Fel­low­ship Lunch” at our church which is essen­tial­ly a giant potluck fol­lowed by the Lord’s Sup­per. Beyond that, we’ll meet for the Lord’s Sup­per again on anoth­er Sun­day dur­ing the month dur­ing our evening service.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Use your Gravatar-enabled email address while commenting to automatically enhance your comment with some of Gravatar's open profile data.

Comments must be made in accordance with the comment policy. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam; learn how your comment data is processed.

You may use Markdown to format your comments; additionally, these HTML tags and attributes may be used: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Rick Beckman