Ken Ham posing next to a dinosaur exhibit

Introducing “The Lie: Evolution”: An Examination

Some years ago, nev­er mind how many exact­ly, I had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to attend an Answers in Gen­e­sis con­fer­ence fea­tur­ing Ken Ham, their founder and pres­i­dent, and anoth­er gen­tle­man whose name I can­not recall but whose pre­sen­ta­tion was much more tar­get­ed toward children.

At the time, mind you, I was a fun­da­men­tal­ist Chris­t­ian with a pas­sion for cre­ation­ism. I spent my time debat­ing the mer­its of “cre­ation sci­ence” in a num­ber of online forums, and great­ly enjoyed see­ing the Ken Ham live and in per­son. I even dropped $60 or so on a col­lec­tion of around ten Answers in Gen­e­sis publications.

cover art of "The Lie: Evolution," featuring an apple-shaped globe with a bite having been taken out of itAmong those books was The Lie: Evo­lu­tion: Gen­e­sis — The Key to Defend­ing Your Faith, (Seri­ous­ly, the book basi­cal­ly has two titles for some rea­son) writ­ten by Ken Ham, “a very pop­u­lar and effec­tive speak­er with Amer­i­can church audi­ences,” accord­ing to the blurb.

When I heard Mr. Ham being an “effec­tive speak­er,” he described what he con­sid­ers one of the pri­ma­ry rea­sons why so many sci­en­tists accept evo­lu­tion despite hav­ing the same evi­dence avail­able to them as the clear­ly sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly supe­ri­or cre­ation­ists: they wore dif­fer­ent “glass­es” which col­ored their inter­pre­ta­tion of the evi­dence avail­able to them. 

A per­son with an unbe­liev­ing world­view would have to do what­ev­er they can to inter­pret evi­dence in a way which “dis­proved” cre­ation­ism, in oth­er words.

At the time I read The Lie: Evo­lu­tion, the glass­es I wore were very much those of a cre­ation­ist; the Bible was true, the great flood hap­pened, and Earth did­n’t exist until between six and ten thou­sand years ago.

When I aban­doned Chris­tian­i­ty, it meant aban­don­ing cre­ation­ism as well, and relearn­ing all that I had known about evo­lu­tion — and then some.

With what I’ve learned over the past six years, I want to sur­vey The Lie: Evo­lu­tion, to remind myself of where I’ve been, to prob­a­bly learn some new stuff along the way, and to share all of it with you.

Luther D. Sun­der­land, author of Dar­win’s Enig­ma: Ebbing the Tide of Nat­u­ral­ism, says in the fore­word to The Lie that Ham “gets to the bot­tom of the prob­lem” of Chris­tians “find­ing that even in the Unit­ed States, the so-called land of the free with a con­sti­tu­tion that guar­an­tees the free exer­cise of reli­gion, their rights are being fla­grant­ly violated?”

Sun­der­land links the promi­nence of evo­lu­tion­ary teach­ing to the “evils of abor­tion, divorce, homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, pornog­ra­phy, and drugs,” and that this con­nec­tion is so “sub­tle that even most of the large reli­gious denom­i­na­tions have been deceived and have failed to rec­og­nize it.”

Evo­lu­tion, Sun­der­land says, leads us to the real­iza­tion that “there is no Cre­ator” and that if there is no Cre­ator, there is no nihilism, or as he says, “no pur­pose in life. … [N]o one watch­ing over us to whom we must some­day have to account for our actions. … [T]here are no absolutes; there is a loss of respect for law and absolute prin­ci­ples, and man is set adrift in a pur­pose­less universe.”

The Lie is “must read­ing for al Chris­tians,” as “Mr. Ham shows that Gen­e­sis … is a depend­able account of actu­al events that are sup­port­ed by sol­id sci­en­tif­ic evidence.”

Okay, so to sum­ma­rize the fore­word of this book, the rea­son Ken Ham wrote it is because the world sucks, and it’s all because we teach evo­lu­tion. After all, we all know that BD, there were no mur­ders, no wars, no rapes, no vio­lence of any kind, no homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, no theft, no drugs, no divorce, etc. No, back then, every­thing was rosy, with every­one fueled by a stead­fast devo­tion to Jesus Christ and a pas­sion for evan­ge­lism. Yep, that was the whole world up until mod­ern times.

Fur­ther, church­es today suck because they too have fall­en vic­tim to the lie of evo­lu­tion. No mat­ter how a church wants to com­pro­mise what the Bible says with what sci­en­tists say of evo­lu­tion, that com­pro­mise is wrong, and the exact words of the Book of Gen­e­sis must be pre­served at all costs.

That’s what we have to look for­ward to in The Lie, which fea­tures chap­ters titled “Chris­tian­i­ty is under Attack,” “Cre­ation, Flood, and Com­ing Fire,” “Death: A Curse and a Bless­ing,” and the cou­plet “Evo­lu­tion Is Reli­gion” and “Cre­ation Is Reli­gion,” a pair of chap­ters which frame the dis­cus­sion not as sci­ence ver­sus reli­gion but as “the sci­ence of one reli­gion ver­sus the sci­ence of anoth­er religion.”

We have a lot to look for­ward to in this book, though I will say, I’ll be skip­ping Ken Ham’s intro­duc­tion to the book, except to sum­ma­rize it here: Ken Ham did­n’t feel com­fort­able with church­es say­ing just accept evo­lu­tion by com­pro­mis­ing it with Gen­e­sis, so he sought out teach­ing that con­firmed his bias and found a way to turn that into a career. I’m sim­pli­fy­ing, obvi­ous­ly, but that’s basi­cal­ly the gist of it. A look at chap­ter one is com­ing soon, so stay tuned!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Use your Gravatar-enabled email address while commenting to automatically enhance your comment with some of Gravatar's open profile data.

Comments must be made in accordance with the comment policy. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam; learn how your comment data is processed.

You may use Markdown to format your comments; additionally, these HTML tags and attributes may be used: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

A Salted Faith
%d bloggers like this: