Is Satan the One Called “Lucifer”?

Then I saw an angel com­ing down from heav­en, hold­ing in his hand the key to the bot­tom­less pit and a great chain. 2And he seized the drag­on, that ancient ser­pent, who is the dev­il and Satan, and bound him for a thou­sand years, 3and threw him into the pit, and shut it and sealed it over him, so that he might not deceive the nations any longer, until the thou­sand years were end­ed. After that he must be released for a lit­tle while. The Rev­e­la­tion of Jesus Christ 20:1–3

Some of Satan’s most impres­sive lies are lies about his own nature. I’ve heard this attrib­uted to var­i­ous peo­ple, that the great­est trick or lie of Satan is that he has con­vinced the world that he does not exist.

Hon­est­ly, I think that if you dis­be­lieve in Satan, you have far worse things to wor­ry about than that, par­tic­u­lar­ly your trust of God’s Word.

Far worse, I think, is believ­ing that Satan exists but gross­ly mis­un­der­stand­ing his nature. For instance, there is the lie that Satan was once a mag­nif­i­cent angel named Lucifer who led a great revolt in Heav­en, caus­ing a great many angels to fall from glo­ry with him. I call that a lie know­ing full well it is the major­i­ty view among Chris­tians, although minor details may very from church to church and indi­vid­ual to individual.

When you start with a lie, though, it’s very dif­fi­cult to ever built to a point where truth is able to be seen, appre­ci­at­ed, and even loved. The base lies cor­rupt every­thing which depends upon them.

Find it no sur­prise, then, that the Son of the Most High Yah­weh has said, “God is spir­it, and those who wor­ship him must wor­ship in spir­it and truth.” ((John 4:24, empha­sis mine.))

Lies cor­rupt every­thing they come in touch with, even some­thing as holy as wor­ship­ing Yah­weh. Con­se­quent­ly, we must seek to expunge untruths, false­hoods, super­sti­tions, and folk­lore from our doc­trine and prac­tice. Mis­con­cep­tions regard­ing Satan are no excep­tion, though he rev­els in our mis­un­der­stand­ing him, “for he is a liar and the father of lies.” ((John 8:44.))

I want to help clear the air of some of the mythos sur­round­ing Satan so that truth may pre­vail in our hearts and minds. The first issue I want to look at is whether Satan was the one called “Lucifer.”

Is Satan the one called “Lucifer”?

Accord­ing to, “Lucifer was cre­at­ed by God as a per­fect angel. He was called Lucifer while he lived in heav­en. After he sinned and per­sis­tent­ly refused to repent he was thrown out of heav­en. When Lucifer was cast out of heav­en he lost his name Lucifer and he became known as Satan.” (( This view seems fair­ly com­mon among Chris­tians, but is it valid?

The name Lucifer can be found in cer­tain trans­la­tions of the Bible, such as the King James Ver­sion, in Isa­iah 14:12. In more reli­able ver­sions, such as the Eng­lish Stan­dard Ver­sion, instead of “Lucifer,” we are giv­en the epi­thet “Day Star” instead.

“How you are fall­en from heav­en, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! 13You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heav­en; above the stars of God I will set my throne on high; I will sit on the mount of assem­bly in the far reach­es of the north; 14I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’ 15But you are brought down to She­ol, to the far reach­es of the pit. 16Those who see you will stare at you and pon­der over you: ‘Is this the man who made the earth trem­ble, who shook king­doms, 17who made the world like a desert and over­threw its cities, who did not let his pris­on­ers go home?’ The Book of Isa­iah 14:12–17

Where does that pas­sage men­tion Satan? Actu­al­ly, that pas­sage picks up in the mid­dle of a larg­er pas­sage, a pas­sage which ear­li­er makes it clear just who is being spo­ken of: “…you will take up this taunt against the king of Baby­lon.” ((Isa­iah 14:4, empha­sis mine.))

A lit­tle over half of Isa­iah 14 is this taunt against Baby­lon’s king, with no indi­ca­tion that the tar­get of the taunt ever changes.

So where do well-mean­ing Chris­tians get the idea that at verse 12, the sub­ject of the taunt switch­es from the king of Baby­lon to Satan?

Quite hon­est­ly, I don’t know for sure. I can only assume ((And yes, I know what assum­ing gets me…)) that the idea comes from two pos­si­ble sources, assum­ing a bib­li­cal source for the notion:

The sev­en­ty-two returned with joy, say­ing, “Lord, even the demons are sub­ject to us in your name!” 18And he said to them, “I saw Satan fall like light­ning from heav­en. The Gospel Accord­ing to Luke 10:17–18

The log­ic must be that because Christ said He saw Satan fall from Heav­en, then if a fall from Heav­en is men­tioned with­in the Scrip­tures, it must refer to Satan’s fall. And so, such a fall is wedged into Isa­iah 14, forc­ing a break in the rant con­cern­ing the king of Babylon.

How­ev­er, if that is the case, and Isa­iah 14 describes Satan’s fall, then we have a very inter­est­ing situation.

Now the ser­pent was more crafty than any oth­er beast of the field that the Lord God had made. ((Gen­e­sis 3:1.))

From Gen­e­sis, we know that Satan was wicked; we know that he was present in the Gar­den with our first par­ents, tempt­ing them to dis­obey Yah­weh. ((“Wait a minute,” you may say, “where does Gen­e­sis 3 refer to Satan?” Fair ques­tion. The open­ing of Rev­e­la­tion 20, quot­ed above, estab­lish­es Satan as “that ancient ser­pent,” which is a fit­ting descrip­tion if he were tru­ly in the Gar­den of Eden some six to ten thou­sand years ago.))

The prob­lem with those who would believe the pas­sage in Isa­iah refers to Satan is this: How many humans were alive at the time Satan tempt­ed Adam & Eve in the garden?

I’ll give you a hint: more than one, but less than three.

How many peo­ple had even exist­ed up until that point? You guessed it: three.

But what does the pas­sage in Isa­iah say? Who­ev­er the Day Star was, he “laid the nations low”, ((Isa­iah 14:12.)) “made the earth to trem­ble”, ((Isa­iah 14:16.)) and “shook king­doms.” ((Ibid.)) He “over­threw [the world’s] cities, [and] did not let his pris­on­ers go home.” ((Isa­iah 14:17.)) All of this the Day Star did in pride­ful antag­o­nism to Yah­weh, as Isa­iah 14:13–14 states, and for it he was cut down, cast into destruction.

If the Day Star was Satan, then when did he fall? It could­n’t have been any time pri­or to the events in the Gar­den of Eden, for there were no cities, king­doms, or peo­ple from which to take prisoners.

I sup­pose at this point, some peo­ple ((Yes, I’ve seen it hap­pen.)) will attempt to rec­on­cile the facts by claim­ing that a pre-adam­ic ((“Before Adam.”)) race of humans once exist­ed which Satan Lucifer was grant­ed to rule over, but he grew in pride until he rebelled against Yah­weh, some­how caus­ing the destruc­tion of those most ancient of peoples.

There­fore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned. ((Romans 5:12.))

Romans 5 should serve as the death knell for such an idea, that there were a race of humans before Adam which Lucifer ruled over. The fact of the mat­ter is that there was no death pri­or to Adam and that Adam’s respon­si­bil­i­ty — not the respon­si­bil­i­ty of name­less pre-adam­ic men — in bring­ing death into the world is tied insep­a­ra­bly to Jesus’ bring­ing redemption.

The Day Star could not have been Satan.

So because Satan was already wicked pri­or to there being king­doms and nations of men, the Day Star (read: Lucifer) could not have been Satan.

Sec­ond­ly, I think peo­ple get the idea that the Day Star was Satan’s orig­i­nal name or descrip­tion from a pas­sage in Revelation:

Now war arose in heav­en, Michael and his angels fight­ing against the drag­on. And the drag­on and his angels fought back, 8but he was defeat­ed and there was no longer any place for them in heav­en. 9And the great drag­on was thrown down, that ancient ser­pent, who is called the dev­il and Satan, the deceiv­er of the whole world—he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him. The Rev­e­la­tion of Jesus Christ 12:7–9

As above, the same sort of con­nec­tion is made: Here is a descrip­tion of Satan being cast down from Heav­en, and so a link to Isa­iah 14 is made to sup­port the pre­sump­tion that the Day Star, or Lucifer, was Satan.

A more care­ful exam­i­na­tion of this Rev­e­la­tion pas­sage, though, reveals that Satan was cast out of Heav­en after the “male child” ((Rev­e­la­tion 12:5.)) was born. This was the birth of Jesus, the “one who is to rule all nations with a rod of iron, but was caught up to God and to his throne.” ((Ibid.))

There­fore, because Rev­e­la­tion describes Satan’s fall from Heav­en at the hands of Michael & his angels as occur­ring after Jesus’ birth, it makes no sense for it to have been described as a past event in Isa­iah 14.

Actu­al­ly, what Rev­e­la­tion 12 describes is Satan’s final fall from Heav­en, when he will no longer be per­mit­ted to accuse the brethren, just as he did Job thou­sands of years ago.

I dis­be­lieve that Satan was Isa­iah’s “Day Star,” but I don’t find it hard to accept at all that Isa­iah was describ­ing the actu­al king of Baby­lon. How often do human rulers fall into the pride­ful sin described by Isa­iah? They lift up their eyes to the heav­ens and believe they can achieve any­thing, with­out God, bet­ter than God.

Human­i­ty is amaz­ing­ly con­sis­tent: We see this behav­ior mak­ing its first huge step onto the scene at Shi­nar, when mankind got togeth­er and sought to build a tow­er to the heav­ens. ((Gen­e­sis 11:4.)) Because of the judg­ment of God upon the men of Shi­nar, the place became known as Babel, the begin­nings of Baby­lon. ((Gen­e­sis 11:9.))

And we see this behav­ior come to its cul­mi­na­tion in Rev­e­la­tion, where we learn that in the unspec­i­fied future, “Baby­lon the great, moth­er of pros­ti­tutes and of earth­’s abom­i­na­tions” ((Rev­e­la­tion 17:5.)) meets its ulti­mate judg­ment: “Rejoice over her, O heav­en, and you saints and apos­tles and prophets, for God has giv­en judg­ment for you against her!” ((Rev­e­la­tion 18:20.))


I hope you’ll join me in refus­ing to call Satan “Lucifer,” and I hope you’ll be will­ing to cor­rect those who do so by point­ing out that “Lucifer” (or bet­ter, the “Day Star”) in Isa­iah’s con­text refers not to Satan but to the king of Baby­lon in a taunt­ing, mock­ing manner.

There are a great deal of oth­er ques­tions I’d like to take a look at regard­ing Satan. Was Satan ever an “anoint­ed cherub”? What is Satan’s ori­gin? What is the leviathan? And more, I’m sure. If you want to be noti­fied when these are writ­ten, be sure to sub­scribe to my syn­di­ca­tion feed!

10 thoughts on “Is Satan the One Called “Lucifer”?”

  1. Since the tra­di­tion­al view is incor­rect, please explain some­thing of the ori­gin and nature of Satan.

  2. michael: I plan to in future posts, as I get the time. Stay tuned.

    (Although I’m pret­ty sure the “tra­di­tion­al view” regard­ing Lucifer is only a few hun­dred ears old. I can’t say that for cer­tain, but I thought I heard some­where that pri­or to the 1500s or some­time, nobody ever equat­ed the Day Star (Lucifer) with Satan.)

  3. This is a won­der­ful and infor­ma­tive piece that you have writ­ten. The truth is grow­ing at a rapid pace- as church­es, books, blogs, and web­sites are telling the truth about the TRUE ORIGIN of Satan. God’s will is being done and as the truth grows we will no longer be a slave to such a bla­tant lie that has manip­u­lat­ed mil­lions of peo­ple. We should be BOLD and not be afraid to tell oth­ers, because GOD is with us. There is a great book out there enti­tled, “God Reveals a Mys­tery!” (avail­able world-wide, includ­ing Barnes and Noble and Ama­zon) that uncov­ers even more infor­ma­tion to give us a bet­ter under­stand­ing about the ser­pent, drag­on, Satan, or the dev­il. Thank you!

  4. Inter­est­ing piece, your read­ing of this pas­sage is very much bet­ter than the tra­di­tion­al alter­na­tive. Thank you very much for this infor­ma­tion, it is very valu­able, I hope you did write those oth­er pieces, I will look them up when I have some more time.

  5. There you go, point­ing out unfin­ished series… I’m prob­a­bly the most incon­sis­tent blog­ger in the his­to­ry of the uni­verse. Hon­est­ly, I don’t remem­ber if I ever wrote any­more on the sub­ject re: the ques­tions at the end of the above post, but if I haven’t, I need to!

    Looks like I did write about Leviathan: What Does the Book of Job Say? and What Does Leviathan Mean?

    Looks like there’s a char­ac­ter encod­ing issue with the lat­ter link, so the Hebrew words don’t show up cor­rect­ly. There may be oth­er issues as well — some of the old­er con­tent has been imported/exported from sev­er­al Word­Press instal­la­tions — but over­all, the con­tent should still be decipherable.

  6. This is true Lucifer was a man. Not Satan. Peo­ple think that there has been a name change. Satan has always been called Satan as in the book of Job. In Hebrew his name is a title “the accuser or adver­sary” of men. Which means he is doing what he was designed to do. Because God had giv­en him this title.
    Jesus calls him the old ser­pent. ha-nachash in Hebrew “The Shin­ing One” trans­la­tion =Ser­pent not a snake, or any­thing hideous .

  7. Lucifer & satan &devil & Prometheus.All these names refer to a sin­gle person,fallen Angel that for teach­ing for­bid­den sci­ences to human was pun­ished And soon will rise and And take revenge from god

  8. That is all well and good, but a Ha-Satan actu­al­ly refers to an angel sent to earth to test man’s faith in him. So the snake of course was a form of Satan, whom has many forms. God could have cast­ed Lucifer, or “Day Star” down after his unwill­ing­ness to repent.. Caus­ing him to become the “Satan” we all know. I would love to hear a counter argue­ment.. The thing is that even if Lucifer isn’t the “Satan” he like­ly has become a Ha-Satan, so regard­less he like­ly is some form of Satan.

  9. This is fact and quite inter­est­ing, I won­der why peo­ple till this age have not come to under­stand­ing, these things.
    Where in the Bible was it writ­ten that Satan was an Angel of God’s praise team?
    Thanks for this arti­cle, I wish most of the so called high men of God will read and accept this truth.

  10. Why do you call God Yah­weh. There is no evi­dence that Yah­weh is the prop­er pro­nun­ci­a­tion of his name. YHWH this is all we know.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Use your Gravatar-enabled email address while commenting to automatically enhance your comment with some of Gravatar's open profile data.

Comments must be made in accordance with the comment policy. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam; learn how your comment data is processed.

You may use Markdown to format your comments; additionally, these HTML tags and attributes may be used: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Rick Beckman