Belated Obligatory July 4 Post

I have seen Chris­t­ian blogs cel­e­brat­ing the fourth, so I won’t do that. It’s be done. Rather, I’ll stick the Book and con­grat­u­late the nation on yet anoth­er anniver­sary if its rebel­lion (a sin like unto witch­craft) against its rulers which were to be found in Great Britain.

Like it or not, if you stick to the Book, you can­not help but believe that the peo­ple are not fit to rule (the major­i­ty is nev­er right, and if they hap­pen to be right, they aren’t being hon­est), which is what we have in Amer­i­ca. Like it or not, if you stick to the Book, you can­not find any­place where God says it is okay to cast off the lead­er­ship over you – whether in fam­i­ly, slav­ery, employ­ment, or nation­al­i­ty – but this is pre­cise­ly what the Found­ing Fathers did.

Amer­i­ca got its start with rebel­lion. Inci­den­tal­ly, so did Satan and the human race. At least the pat­tern is holding.

For­get the roman­ti­cized, noble accounts of “life, lib­er­ty, and the pur­suit of hap­pi­ness” in the ear­ly days of the nation. Where were the Chris­tians cry­ing out that a nation starts on the wrong foot if that foot’s first step is on the limb of rebellion?

And why have Chris­tians since then so eas­i­ly for­got­ten that rebel­lion is a sin, and every July 4, that rebel­lion is cel­e­brat­ed. A nation gives us a lit­tle bit of free­dom, and we use it as a license to and endorse­ment of sin? May it not be so!

I’m post­ing this a few hours after the fourth to give you a year to think about these things, and so I don’t ruin any­one’s fun. Or maybe it’s because I com­plete­ly for­got I should blog about the event. Either way, if you are a Chris­t­ian and you still hold any pre­tense of being patri­ot­ic in any way oth­er than hon­or­ing lead­er­ship and obey­ing the law, I implore you to go to the Scrip­tures and find out what they say about gov­ern­ment and the believ­er’s allegiances.

8 thoughts on “Belated Obligatory July 4 Post”

  1. You, sir, should move to Britain.

    Explain to me Moses and the Exo­dus. Per­haps “God” also called, in some way, this nation’s founders.

    Either way I think you’re way off base.

  2. I don’t know my his­to­ry of the Unit­ed States as well as I should, but is it not true that the British played a large part in set­tling Amer­i­ca? So in real­i­ty the amer­i­can peo­ple of that time rebelled against their own. As far as Moses goes, God’s peo­ple were under forced slav­ery and were released. If we want to com­pare Moses let’s com­pare the Civ­il War.

  3. I see your point. And I think you’re cor­rect in your facts and your log­ic for the most part. How­ev­er, I would­n’t go so far as to say that rebel­lion is always sin. That just does­n’t jive with my under­stand­ing of Theology.

  4. Ben (com­menter #1, not #3): Why should I move to Britain? The only nation I’m hap­py to be a part of with­out find­ing prob­lems with its lead­er­ship is the King­dom of God. I’m not dis­mayed enough with Amer­i­ca to run away. It’d be too much trou­ble and would­n’t real­ly solve any­thing, after all.

    Moses’ lead­ing of the Israelites out of Egypt was God’s call­ing of a phys­i­cal nation. He cre­at­ed the nation of Israel. It was His nation. In sep­a­rat­ing Moses and the rest of the Israelites out of Egypt, God was cor­rect­ing a mis­take – the enslave­ment and cap­tiv­i­ty of a nation which was always meant to be called out and phys­i­cal­ly sep­a­rate (hence the strict demands of the Law, involv­ing cloth­ing type and farm­ing meth­ods and more).

    This can­not be com­pared to a nation sep­a­rat­ing itself out from anoth­er nation over mat­ters of tax­a­tion or any­thing else; it also can­not be said that God called the Found­ing Fathers to do what they did because God nev­er spoke pos­i­tive­ly of peo­ple-rule.

    I also would cau­tion that think­ing God called the Found­ing Fathers to do what they did comes dan­ger­ous­ly close to adding to His word. God acts by reveal­ing what He’ll do to His prophets first, and they make no men­tion of Amer­i­ca, yet they firm­ly men­tioned every­thing God has been actu­al­ly doing – sav­ing souls, pre­serv­ing souls, chas­ten­ing way­ward chil­dren, etc., etc.

    Romans 13:1 – 7 ends the debate as far as I’m con­cerned. The rulers of the colonies were in Eng­land. They had a right to tax the colonies, and they were under no bib­li­cal oblig­a­tion to have colo­nial representation.

    Let every soul be sub­ject to the gov­ern­ing author­i­ties. For there is no author­i­ty except from God, and the author­i­ties that exist are appoint­ed by God. There­fore who­ev­er resists the author­i­ty resists the ordi­nance of God, and those who resist will bring judg­ment on them­selves. For rulers are not a ter­ror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the author­i­ty? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. For he is God’s min­is­ter to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s min­is­ter, an avenger to exe­cute wrath on him who prac­tices evil. There­fore you must be sub­ject, not only because of wrath but also for con­science sake. For because of this you also pay tax­es, for they are God’s min­is­ters attend­ing con­tin­u­al­ly to this very thing. Ren­der there­fore to all their due: tax­es to whom tax­es are due, cus­toms to whom cus­toms, fear to whom fear, hon­or to whom hon­or. (NKJV)

  5. Jeff Adams writes:

    If one were to accept the argu­ment that Scrip­ture demands unques­tion­ing sub­mis­sion to the state, how could any­one fault those who obeyed orders to car­ry out atroc­i­ties (such as fol­low­ing bru­tal orders from Hitler, Stal­in, Mao, etc.)? From a world­ly per­spec­tive, the Nurem­burg tri­als refute the idea of total sub­mis­sion to the state, and reject the con­cept of ‘I was just fol­low­ing orders.’ In truth, as Chris­tians we are called to fol­low God­ly gov­ern­ment as long as it is just that: God­ly, and does­n’t run counter to the laws of God. If a gov­ern­ment starts to act in ways that put a believ­er in con­flict between what God calls us to do and what the gov­ern­ment calls us to do, then a believ­er has to sub­mit to the Supreme author­i­ty rather than to the flawed earth­ly author­i­ty of a man-made government.

    Enter the Puri­tans, and oth­er “fac­tions”, which helped bring this coun­try into exis­tence in Jamestown and Boston.

    Adam goes on to say:

    … the founders were act­ing in keep­ing with Romans 13:1 – 7 by rebelling against a gov­ern­ment that was dis­hon­or­ing God in how it was deal­ing with its colo­nial sub­jects. We, as Chris­tians, would be act­ing in accor­dance with Romans 13:1 – 7 if we rebelled against a gov­ern­ment that vio­lates our writ­ten laws (the Con­sti­tu­tion), pro­motes immoral­i­ty (legal­iza­tion of pornog­ra­phy, homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, no-fault divorce, same-sex mar­riage, pros­ti­tu­tion, etc.), and attempt­ed to sub­vert our Chris­t­ian faith (such as ban­ning pub­lic dis­plays of cross­es, nativ­i­ty scenes, the Ten Com­mand­ments, pub­lic prayer, denied our free exer­cise of our faith, etc.).

    Read the whole arti­cle:

  6. Sad­ly, Jeff Adams is entire­ly mis­tak­en. I don’t advo­cate unques­tion­ing author­i­ty; I don’t believe any Chris­t­ian should obey if obe­di­ence leads to sin.

    How­ev­er, there is noth­ing in the Bible which allows for the cast­ing off of a gov­ern­ment because it is “ungod­ly.”

    Did Paul, when he appeared before Roman rulers, seek to change their minds about the ram­pant per­se­cu­tion of the church? No! He sim­ply shared the gospel message.

    The gov­ern­ment of Eng­land was not forc­ing Chris­tians in Amer­i­ca to sin, so where’s the big com­plaint? The issue was over mon­ey. Don’t tax me if I can’t be rep­re­sent­ed! I want more con­trol over how much I have to give you! I love my mon­ey too much to let you decide!

    The love of mon­ey is the root of all sorts of evil, includ­ing rebel­lion against the government.

  7. Mon­toya: How far does one take it, though? Scrip­ture nev­er, ever, ever tells a Chris­t­ian to flee per­se­cu­tion. James clears that mat­ter up very nice­ly by say­ing when our faith is test­ed and we fall into tri­als, we should count it all joy. Not just some joy. Not just, “I’ll be hap­py when it’s over,” but ALL joy. Jesus said we are blessed, or hap­py, when men per­se­cute us or use us. There is laid up in Heav­en spe­cial rewards for those who endure per­se­cu­tion faithfully.

    If you can pro­vide me an exam­ple of a Chris­t­ian in the Bible say­ing, “I don’t like Rome. I’m mark­ing out a ter­ri­to­ry and declar­ing it Chris­tian­land and I’m going to let the peo­ple rule ’cause we all know that’s a good idea,” then I will love Amer­i­ca with all my heart.

    God calls hus­bands or wives to remain even with the worst spouse and to love them faithfully.
    God calls slaves to lov­ing­ly sub­mit to their masters.
    God calls Chris­tians to be in sub­mis­sion to the author­i­ty over them.

    There is no lee­way for rebel­lion against any mas­ter, unless obey­ing that mas­ter would cause us to dis­obey the Lord. And a Chris­t­ian can­not rebel against Satan; he is no longer any author­i­ty over us.

    I’m not say­ing you can’t leave the coun­try. That isn’t rebel­lion; that’s an allow­able thing. But if a coun­try has a claim on land, it is rebel­lion to say, “No, now this land is Chris­tian­land, and if you don’t like it, send some sol­diers over and we’ll kill them.” Of course, war goes right along with the New Tes­ta­ment prin­ci­ple of liv­ing peace­ably with all men, but when it comes to patri­o­tism, the Book takes a back seat (or is tossed out the win­dow alto­geth­er, in many cases).

    Ali­cia: You’re right, there isn’t real­ly any­thing wrong with cel­e­brat­ing cer­tain days. And I will nev­er judge some­one for doing so, as the Scrip­tures demand. But I only cau­tion Chris­tians to be edu­cat­ed about what they are cel­e­brat­ing. Birth­days are easy; you cel­e­brate your birth. Thanks­giv­ing cel­e­brates, well, being thank­ful, which is of course bib­li­cal. Christ­mas and East­er I won’t even go into ’cause I’d be here far too long. And the Fourth of July cel­e­brates a rebel­lion. It can­not be sug­ar­coat­ed unless it is mis­un­der­stood. Democ­ra­cy – the rule of the peo­ple – is the fruit of that rebel­lion, and once peo­ple rule, God is no longer need­ed except as a token (“God bless Amer­i­ca,” “In God we trust,” “One nation under God,” and oth­er cute lit­tle non-bib­li­cal expres­sions of wor­ship of the sup­posed bib­li­cal God).

    Sad­ly, this same democ­ra­cy has invad­ed many church­es, as over­seers are vot­ed for by the con­gre­ga­tion rather than appoint­ed by evan­ge­lists. Seri­ous­ly, what kind of rule is it when you get to pick your ruler? Hmm, I want this or that to be allowed and this banned, so let’s vote for this guy over here. No prob­lem obey­ing him. Yes-sir-ee.

  8. Rebel­lion against God is a sin, and rebel­lion against your par­ents is a sin, but rebel­lion against the dev­il is not. If the peo­ple who came to Amer­i­ca were flee­ing from reli­gious per­se­cu­tion, then it was not a sin. I agree our coun­try did not start out on the right foot but this is not the rea­son. And no, I don’t cel­e­brate July 4th.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Use your Gravatar-enabled email address while commenting to automatically enhance your comment with some of Gravatar's open profile data.

Comments must be made in accordance with the comment policy. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam; learn how your comment data is processed.

You may use Markdown to format your comments; additionally, these HTML tags and attributes may be used: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

A Salted Faith
%d bloggers like this: