Gov­ern­ment Schools and the Chris­t­ian Remnant

by Rick Beckman on April 4, 02009

I am grate­ful that the inci­dents described in the video below did not so much hold true at my high school. I dis­tinctly remem­ber a cou­ple of teach­ers talk­ing openly about church and such within the class rooms; I also recall that the school had pur­chased metal detec­tors for the doors but I don’t recall them ever hav­ing used them. (So there is a com­plaint about taxes and unnec­es­sary spend­ing some­where in there, I guess…).

In light of the inci­dents described in the video, though, I am again reminded of the impor­tance of home school­ing. Schools are able to impress upon chil­dren and young adults ideals endorsed by an increas­ingly (antichristian|socialist|not-what-this-nation-is-used-to) gov­ern­ment, and we should not be sur­prised when we learn the hard way that the chil­dren being our future isn’t nec­es­sar­ily a good thing.

As the video points out, the First Amend­ment to the Con­sti­tu­tion does indeed pro­tect the minor­ity against the major­ity, but it seems an obvi­ous corol­lary that the First Amend­ment only works if the major­ity them­selves accept it. What hap­pens when year after year hun­dreds of thou­sands grad­u­ate high school under­stand­ing and accept­ing that the gov­ern­ment can muz­zle us?

When I last posted, I won­dered aloud that maybe there was some­thing to the lib­eral side of pol­i­tics. The con­clu­sion of that mat­ter is that if democ­racy is the absolute — if “we the peo­ple…” are the power — then I’m not for sure that we can all Barack Obama’s pol­i­tics “unamer­i­can” sim­ply because Amer­ica elected him.

How­ever, what I’m finally — finally — start­ing to real­ize, what is finally coa­lesc­ing in my mind is that democ­racy isn’t the ulti­mate real­ity in Amer­i­can pol­i­tics, that Amer­i­can pol­i­tics isn’t sacred.

Rather, democ­racy, like any other sys­tem of gov­ern­ment, is a tool whereby God’s will may be done. Ulti­mately, His will is the absolute, the final con­cern of all who are His.

Recall that in Israel, a suc­ces­sion of kings was used to accom­plish God’s will, with some kings wholly embrac­ing His law, cast­ing down idols and allow­ing wor­ship of Yah­weh to flourish.

The New Tes­ta­ment reit­er­ates the respon­si­bil­ity of a gov­ern­ment to pun­ish the wicked and to reward the good. In Amer­ica, the good are an increas­ingly trod­den upon rem­nant who have lost their foot­ing; democ­racy is per­haps the most dif­fi­cult insti­tu­tion of gov­ern­ment ever devised, for it allows no checks and bal­ances against the wretched heart of nat­ural man.

It is, after all, a mat­ter of bib­li­cal fact that the Chris­t­ian rem­nant is a minor­ity wher­ever it is found, and it only takes a cur­sory overview of the Scrip­tures to dis­cern that very lit­tle of what passes for Chris­tian­ity in Amer­ica is actual Christianity.

Stu­dents across the nation are being raised by insti­tu­tions that tell them that faith has no rel­e­vance in learn­ing, that for­ni­ca­tion is accept­able if done “safely,” that humankind owes its exis­tence to an ancient, inevitable process of cos­mic and bio­log­i­cal evo­lu­tion, and that they are not to be crit­i­cal of “alter­na­tive” lifestyles and sexualities.

America’s most impres­sion­able cit­i­zens, for nearly forty hours of every school week, are being sys­tem­at­i­cally pro­grammed to be antag­o­nis­tic toward Truth. Even for school chil­dren from Chris­t­ian house­holds, it is unlikely that their time with their par­ents or church is as pro­duc­tive or impres­sive as their time at the gov­ern­ment learn­ing insti­tu­tions — after all, once you sub­tract time for all of the after school and extracur­ric­u­lar activ­i­ties, social lives, tele­vi­sion, and so on, you don’t get much time to pass down Chris­t­ian mores and truths.

The Con­sti­tu­tion guar­an­tees that absolute power is never vested in one man; across the world, monar­chy is being replaced with democ­racy. Yet on the off chance that we’d have a king like unto David or Josiah, a king who would cast down idols from our land and use their author­ity in obe­di­ence to Yah­weh rather than in igno­rance or oppo­si­tion to Him… Per­haps a king is what this nation needs? (That tax­a­tion was so much a moti­va­tion for our cast­ing off of monar­chy in Amer­ica, I can’t help but to begin to won­der just how much the love of money influ­enced the Amer­i­can revolution?)

Of course, some of you may like to point out that not all of Israel’s kings were as godly as David turned out; fair enough, but I won­der how dif­fer­ent that’d be from the pro-​abortion, pro-​homosexuality, pro-​Islam yet still some­how “Chris­t­ian” Pres­i­dent that we have today?

Just won­der­ing out loud, and as always, your thoughts and ques­tions are welcomed.

Video found on The Mil­i­tant Lib­er­tar­ian.

Super­charge Your Site!

The­sis is the world’s most advanced Word­Press theme, and it can do for your site what it has done to thou­sands. With crystal-​clear typog­ra­phy, deep SEO, and a design that puts the focus on your con­tent, doesn’t your site deserve the absolute best?

Earn Affil­i­ate Sales… Effortlessly!

Take the effort out of affil­i­ate mar­ket­ing. Link to stores & prod­ucts as you nor­mally would; VigLink cre­ates the affil­i­ate tags for you.

And all you have to do is col­lect the rewards!

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Mike April 6, 2009 at 10:56

Our President is not pro-abortion because pro-abortion is not a valid view, the same goes for pro-homosexuality. Pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality means he is for abortions and homosexuality not the choice. Semantics are important.

You are saying that one can not be Christian if someone believes in choice? I obviously have differing views from you and I’m not going to try to start a debate over such topics but I believe you need to reflect on what Christianity at its source really is about. It is very common but wrong and not Christian in thought and action to say someone isn’t Christian because someone has differing views as this post suggests. Disagree about issues but do not exclude and dismiss someone from a religion because their take on issues isn’t the same as yours.

Rick Beckman April 6, 2009 at 13:06

No, the president is most certainly pro-abortion. He’s even on record as saying he’d want his own daughter to abort if she was ever “punished” with a baby.

Bottom line, to be a Christian is to believe the Scriptures, which take an extremely high view of life and an extremely low view of sin.

The Christian view of homosexuality is that it is sinful, ungodly, and opposed to God. The Christian view of abortion is that it is murder, the taking of innocent blood, a crime for which God unequivocally declares His hatred of not only the act but the perpetrator.

For politicians to promote and advocate for these sins is to reflect a rather low — or, dare I say, American — view of Christianity.

If one starts at the Scriptures to determine what a Christian is, then a Christian is a person who recognizes pregnancy and children as gifts from God, that He is in control of life giving and sustaining. Abortion says, “No, God, you were wrong in giving me this child, so I will have it brutally ripped from me.”

That’s the view I will hold until someone is able to defend abortion or homosexuality or any of America’s other darling sins exegetically from the Scriptures. If it cannot be done — and indeed, it cannot — then I will continue to maintain the position that I have staked out.

Becoming a politician also is no excuse to soften your views. Note that in the Old Testament, the “good kings” who led Israel into times of blessing were the ones that were what we may call today “militant fundamentalists.” They embraced their faith in Yahweh and ruled accordingly. Those who made their faith take a back seat to the heathen will of the people, well,… Let’s just say there are some hardships that the Jews went through that I’d prefer we skip here in America.

Brandon April 10, 2009 at 13:30

Meanwhile, we in Canada were blessed with at least a Prime Minister who is willing to recognize freedom of speech rights, and offer (a career jeopardizing?) Easter greeting from the office of the Prime Minister.

Rick Beckman April 10, 2009 at 23:44

Always a pleasure to have you drop by, Brandon. I’m glad to hear that there are still major national officials who are willing to let their faith do the talking. All this “under a bushel” nonsense that “faith doesn’t mix with politics” breeds here in America is nauseating.

Matt Langford April 14, 2009 at 04:38

Rick, it is very troubling that most politicians attempt to explain away any affiliation they have with Christianity’s core values. Seeing your last comment referencing the ignorant thought that “faith doesn’t mix with politics” reminded me of this: Governor Bobby Jindal on Christianity. Hopefully, he will not compromise his beliefs as so many other politicians have in modern times.

I love what you write, keep up the good work!

Brandon April 20, 2009 at 09:35

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: