Enoch Walked with God and Was Not

by Rick Beckman on May 20, 02008

Four­teen months ago, I set my friend David & his fam­ily up with free server space for their mis­sion­ary web­site. They are soon headed to Ire­land for the fore­see­able future, engag­ing the cul­ture of Dublin through art­work. A selec­tion of David’s art­work is on their site, if you’re curious.

In exchange for the server space, David said he’d paint us an orig­i­nal work for our man­tle. The theme cho­sen for the paint­ing was Enoch. If you’re not famil­iar with Enoch, well, we don’t know a lot about him, but what we do know stag­gers my imagination:

Enoch walked with God after he fathered Methuse­lah 300 years and had other sons and daugh­ters. 23Thus all the days of Enoch were 365 years. 24Enoch walked with God, and he was not, for God took him. Gen­e­sis 5:22 – 24, ESV

The New Tes­ta­ment Epis­tle of Jude — which hap­pens to be by far my favorite book of the Bible, and not just because it’s a quick read! — expands on Enoch by reveal­ing that he was a prophet who, some­thing like 5,000 years ago, preached the Sec­ond Com­ing of Christ and His judg­ment upon false teachers:

It was also about these that Enoch, the sev­enth from Adam, proph­e­sied, say­ing, “Behold, the Lord came with ten thou­sands of his holy ones, 15to exe­cute judg­ment on all and to con­vict all the ungodly of all their deeds of ungod­li­ness that they have com­mit­ted in such an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things that ungodly sin­ners have spo­ken against him.” Jude 14 – 15, ESV

That proph­esy is almost ver­ba­tim from an apoc­ryphal work known as 1 Enoch, which is very inter­est­ing read­ing in and of itself, espe­cially if you have any inter­est at all in angels, the Flood, or just what the heck was going on with man dur­ing the time of Gen­e­sis 6. For bet­ter or worse, what is writ­ten in 1 Enoch can’t be taken as absolute truth as it is not an inspired work — but that doesn’t mean it is all bla­tantly false, and Jude at least con­firms Enoch’s prophecy as recorded in 1 Enoch as being valid.

Suf­fice it to say, I find Enoch to be quite the his­tor­i­cal fig­ure, and I’m happy to have hang­ing over our man­tle the David Baker orig­i­nal Enoch Walked with God and Was Not.

I rarely ever use it, but the pic­tures are present on my Flickr Pho­to­stream.

What do you think of the paint­ing? I’d love to hear oth­ers’ inter­pre­ta­tions of it. It’s already late or I’d con­tinue writ­ing and share my thoughts, but I may give myself a few days’ of look­ing at it before doing some­thing like that.

Super­charge Your Site!

The­sis is the world’s most advanced Word­Press theme, and it can do for your site what it has done to thou­sands. With crystal-​clear typog­ra­phy, deep SEO, and a design that puts the focus on your con­tent, doesn’t your site deserve the absolute best?

Earn Affil­i­ate Sales… Effortlessly!

Take the effort out of affil­i­ate mar­ket­ing. Link to stores & prod­ucts as you nor­mally would; VigLink cre­ates the affil­i­ate tags for you.

And all you have to do is col­lect the rewards!

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Brandon May 21, 2008 at 14:35

It looks like either a.) a giant unborn child hovering in the sky over the road, or b.) experimenting with bungee-jumping in a Ziploc.

I would feel uncomfortable as a passenger on that road.

David Baker May 24, 2008 at 19:34

I like it.

Rick Beckman May 24, 2008 at 21:04

David Baker: One should hope so. :)

We’ve gotten mixed reactions over it; close to a dozen members members of our family have seen it, plus other friends. Some like it, some don’t, but it doesn’t matter. I really do like it.

It reminds me of the Star Child seen at the end of 2001: A Space Oddysey, but it’s also a constant reminder that no one will ever come unto the Father unless he is first born again. And for Enoch, well, that new birth happened en route.

Dad commented that seeing the painting here, it wasn’t too apparent that it was a hand with fingers between Enoch’s head & legs; instead, it looked like a microphone with the umbilical cord acting as its cord. It apparently looks much more like a hand when viewing it in person. :)

Alicia May 25, 2008 at 14:28

mom didn’t quite like it. she said that it was odd because it looked like a man and not a baby.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: